![]() |
![]() |
Recluse reflections: Microsoft employees preparing letter to Gates/Ballmer? Notes on spaces seen through windows |
![]() |
|
![]() Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Microsoft employees preparing letter to Gates/Ballmer?
Raw Story reports that a group of Microsoft employees are preparing a letter to firm's leaders asking for clarification on diversity policies.
If true, this is yet another indication that the Redmond giant's back-pedaling could have long-term economic and diversity consequences for the firm. The question is probably even more pressing now that has discovered and Microsoft was forced to confirm that noted foreign affairs expert Ralph Reed is still being paid as a consultant to Microsoft. What's that? You say you didn't know that Reed is a foreign affairs expert. Apparently Microsoft thinks he is, because company spokesperson Mark Murray insisted to the P-I that Reed's consulting company is paid to advise the company on "trade and competition issues" and hasn't been asked to advise on social issues. That revelation might might prompt stockholders to ask if Microsoft is really spending its money wisely, except that most of them would understand that Microsoft isn't really expecting advice from Reed. The P-I summarizes Reed's resume: Reed, who got his start in politics by running the Christian Coalition for Robertson and who had a senior role in President Bush's 2004 campaign, is a leading figure in the social conservative movement that spearheaded opposition to gay marriage, stem cell research, abortion, gambling and other issues. Although he may be lacking any apparent expertise in "trade and competition issues," Reed certainly does not lack friends in high places -- friends like the ethically-challenged House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, and the President himself. The P-I notes that Microsoft has been generous to other special friend of DeLay: In the most recent lobbying disclosure on file, Microsoft reported spending $5.4 million on lobbying in the first six months of 2004. The company still apparently feels it was unfairly targeted during the Clinton administration (when it didn't spend much on lobbying) for its monopolistic practices. Now it attempts to buy influence with today's power-brokers. But can a company that buys "friends" like this and that also seeks to gain the respect of an intolerant minority among its employee ranks really expect to retain a reputation for diversity? Doubtful. P-I columnist Robert L. Jamieson explains it this way: What is most troubling here is Reed's bedside relationship with Microsoft around the same time the company backtracked suddenly from gay rights legislation it had embraced just a year ago. Jamieson draws this conclusion: "When Microsoft faced the question of the gay rights bill it let the right hand of God draw the line in the sand in the wrong place." posted by WebWrangler | 5:02 PM | Link | 0 comments
Comments:
Post a Comment
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Blogroll Me! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |